Impact of perioperative hydrocortisone administration on the regeneration of the future liver remnant in right lobe living-related liver donors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2026-2-17Keywords:
living donors, hepatectomy, liver regeneration, hydrocortisone, tomography, X-ray computedAbstract
Liver transplantation from a living-related donor remains one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease. Ensuring maximum donor safety and preventing postoperative liver failure is an absolute priority. A key factor in the favorable postoperative course in donors after right hemihepatectomy is the rapid and complete regeneration of the future liver remnant (FLR). Liver resection and unavoidable ischemia-reperfusion injury trigger a cascade of systemic inflammatory responses with a massive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin-6. While controlled inflammation is necessary to initiate the regeneration process, hyperinflammation can disrupt microcirculation and slow early parenchymal recovery. Perioperative glucocorticosteroid administration is an effective method of modulating inflammation, yet its direct impact on morphological regeneration in living donors remains insufficiently studied.
Objective – to investigate the effect of perioperative intravenous hydrocortisone on the dynamics of the regenerative capacity of the future liver remnant in living-related donors after right hemihepatectomy using computed tomography (CT) volumetry.
Materials and methods. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Oberig Clinic from September 2023 to December 2025. The study included 100 right lobe living-related liver donors. The experimental group (Group A, n=50) received an intravenous bolus of 500 mg hydrocortisone sodium succinate 10 – 15 minutes before parenchymal transection, followed by 100 mg/day on postoperative days 1 to 5. The control group (Group B, n=50) received standard care without systemic steroids. The left liver lobe volume was assessed using multidetector CT before surgery (RLV0), on day 14 (RLV14), and on day 90 (RLV90).
Results. Preoperative RLV0 was similar between groups (440.0±96.5 mL in Group A, 448.7±94.0 mL in Group B, p=0.649). On postoperative day 14, Group A demonstrated a significantly more intensive volume increase: RLV14 reached 889.9±181.8 mL compared to 808.3±154.3 mL (p=0.017), with a regeneration index of 106.3±37.5% vs. 84.9±42.3% (p=0.009). On day 90, the difference became highly significant: RLV90 was 1097.4±203.8 mL vs. 920.6±143.8 mL (p < 0.001), with an increase of 155.1±45.7% vs. 110.4±38.0% (p < 0.001). Hydrocortisone effectively smoothes the pathological peak of inflammation and prevents massive ischemia-reperfusion injury. Preserved from excessive apoptosis, the parenchyma receives optimal conditions for full cellular division from the first days.
Conclusions. Perioperative intravenous hydrocortisone is safe and does not suppress liver recovery. Modulation of the systemic inflammatory response significantly increases the intensity of morphological regeneration of the left liver lobe, as confirmed by a significant increase in absolute volume and regeneration index in both early (p=0.009) and late (p < 0.001) postoperative periods.
References
Aziz H, Kwon YIC, Alvi S, Ahmad S, Ganguli S, Goodman M, Kwon YK. Does Chronic Use of Steroids Affect Outcomes After Liver Resection? Analysis of a National Database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Oct;26(10):2093-2100. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05393-y.
Bressan AK, Isherwood S, Bathe OF, Dixon E, Sutherland FR, Ball CG. Preoperative Single-dose Methylprednisolone Prevents Surgical Site Infections After Major Liver Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):281-287. http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004720.
Çelik H, Odaman H, Altay C, Ünek T, Özbilgin M, Egeli T, Ağalar C, Astarcıoğlu İK, Barlık F. Manual and semi-automated computed tomography volumetry significantly overestimates the right liver lobe graft weight: a single-center study with adult living liver donors. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Jan 8;30(1):3-8. http://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.221903.
Clemens MM, Kennon-McGill S, Vazquez JH, Stephens OW, Peterson EA, Johann DJ, Allard FD, Yee EU, McCullough SS, James LP, Finck BN, McGill MR. Exogenous phosphatidic acid reduces acetaminophen-induced liver injury in mice by activating hepatic interleukin-6 signaling through inter-organ crosstalk. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021 Dec;11(12):3836-3846. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.08.024.
Do H, Baik J, Gwon SM, Lee E, Ryu Y, Kim B, Lim S, Oh N, Rhu J, Choi GS, Kim J. Accuracy and efficiency of artificial Intelligence-Assisted three-dimensional liver volumetry in living donor evaluation based on real world prospective data. HPB (Oxford). 2026 Feb;28(2):236-244. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.014.
Kim NR, Choi GH, Choi JS, Han DH. Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jul;109(1):27-34. http://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27.
Kotenko I.O, Dronov OI. Assessment of the regenerative capacity of the remnant liver lobe in living-related donors after right hemihepatectomy. Zaporozhye Medical Journal. 2025 Nov;27(5):417–420. http://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2025.5.340579.
Li L, Cui L, Lin P, Liu Z, Bao S, Ma X, Nan H, Zhu W, Cen J, Mao Y, Ma X, Jiang L, Nie Y, Ginhoux F, Li Y, Li H, Hui L. Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers. Cell Stem Cell. 2023 Mar 2;30(3):283-299.e9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2023.01.009.
Liu L, Zhang C, Lu T, Li X, Jiang Z, Tian H, Hao X, Yang K, Guo T. The efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid for perioperative patients with hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan;17(1):59-71. http://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2023.2162878.
Satilmis B, Akbulut S, Sahin TT, Dalda Y, Tuncer A, Kucukakcali Z, Ogut Z, Yilmaz S. Assessment of Liver Regeneration in Patients Who Have Undergone Living Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;11(2):244. http://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020244.
Steinthorsdottir KJ, Awada HN, Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Hillingsø JG, Jans Ø, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK. Preoperative high-dose glucocorticoids for early recovery after liver resection: randomized double-blinded trial. BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(5):zrab063. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab063.
Tan EK, Zheng V, Tuieng SY, Low ASC, Chai STS, Phang YX, Koh YX, Chung AYF, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Goh BKP. Evaluation of Liver Volume Estimation Methods in Living Donor Liver Transplant: CT Volumetry vs MeVis, With Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery. Transplant Proc. 2025 Mar;57(2):292-297. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.017.
Wang MJ, Zhang HL, Chen F, Guo XJ, Liu QG, Hou J. The double-edged effects of IL-6 in liver regeneration, aging, inflammation, and diseases. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024 Jun 18;13(1):62. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00527-1.
Yang X, Park S, Lee S, Han K, Lee MR, Song JS, Yu HC, Do Yang J. Estimation of right lobe graft weight for living donor liver transplantation using deep learning-based fully automatic computed tomographic volumetry. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 18;13(1):17746. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45140-0.
Zhang Y, Li B, He Q, Chu Z, Ji Q. Comparison of liver regeneration between donors and recipients after adult right lobe living-donor liver transplantation. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jun;12(6):3184-3192. http://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-1077
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
