Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a one-year follow-up study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2021-1-31

Keywords:

totally extraperitoneal hernia repair, Lichtenstein repair, inguinal hernia, surgery

Abstract

The inguinal hernia has an incidence of 27 — 43 % in males. Surgical repair is the most accepted treatment to prevent the development of complications. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become popular worldwide and includes the use of a laparoscopic technique for mesh placement behind the defect.

Objective — to assess whether totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair shows benefits over Lichtenstein repair in intraoperative and one‑year follow‑up postoperative outcomes for male patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Materials and methods. 53 males were randomly allocated to two groups. Group 1 included 27 patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal hernia repair using self‑gripping lightweight mesh, and group 2 included 26 patients who were treated surgically with Lichtenstein repair using lightweight mesh.

Results. Both groups were comparable in mean age, type of hernia, body mass index and patient’s distribution according to the European hernia society classification. TEP repair takes on average a little less time as compared to Lichtenstein repair, and this difference is not statistically significant. The mean of visual analogue scale for pain scoring in the first 24 hours after surgery as well as in the next 24 hours is statistically significantly smaller in group 1 compared to group 2. The mean time taken to return to work was 2.15 times longer in group 2 than in group 1, and the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions. Totally extraperitoneal hernia repair shows potential benefits over Lichtenstein repair for primary unilateral inguinal hernias as it causes less pain in the postoperative period and ensures early return to work.

 

Author Biographies

H. O. Havrylov, Clinic Medikom, Kyiv

-

O. V. Shulyarenko, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

-

References

Anadol AZ, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, et al. A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh for inguinal hernia. Surg Today. 2011;41(11):1498-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-4545-8.

Bowling K, El-Badawy S, Massri E, et al. Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: Patient reported outcomes in the elderly from a single centre-A prospective cohort study. Annal Med Surg. 2017 Oct;22:12-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.08.013

Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 2009;23:482-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0118-3.

Feleshtynsky YaP, Shtaier A. An improved transabdominal preperitoneal alloplast for recurrent inguinal hernias after Lichtenstein’s surgery. EUREKA: Health Sciences.; 4 (2020):77-81. doi: 10.21303/2504-5679.2020.001364.

Ger R, Mishrick A, Hurwitz J, Romero C, Oddsen R. Management of groin hernias by laparoscopy. World J Surg. 1993;17(1):46-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655704.

Hachisuka T. Femoral hernia repair. Surg Clin N Am. 2003;83:1189-1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00120-8.

Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias. Am J Surg. 2017 Jul 19: S0002-9610(17)30662-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016.

Kozol R, Lange PM, Kosir M, et al. A prospective, randomized study of open vs laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An assessment of postoperative pain. Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):292-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270078015

Legutko J, Pach R, Solecki R, et al. The history of treatment of groin hernia. Folia Med Cracov. 2008;49:57-74.

Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK. Twenty questions about hernioplasty. The American surgeon. 1991;57(11):730-3.

Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G, et al. The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember Hernia. 2007;11:113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0198-3.

Nichitailo ME, Bulik II. Sovremennye aspekty endovideokhirurgicheskogo lecheniia slozhnykh i retsidivnikh pakhovykh gryzh [Modern aspects endovideosurgical treatment of complex and recurrent inguinal hernias]. Klin Khirurgiia. 2010;(3):10-6. Russian.

Simons MP, Smietanski M, Bonjer HJ, et al. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia Surge Group. Hernia. 2018;22 : 1-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x.

Usher FC. Hernia repair with knitted polypropylene mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117 : 239-40.

Yang HW, Kang SH, Jung SY, Min BW, Lee SI. Efficacy and safety of a novel partially absorbable mesh in totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2017;93(6):316-21. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.6.316.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

1.
Havrylov H, Shulyarenko O. Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a one-year follow-up study. ЗХ [Internet]. 2021Dec.23 [cited 2024Nov.23];(1):31—35. Available from: http://generalsurgery.com.ua/article/view/247559

Issue

Section

Original Research