Technical aspects of performing laparoscopic hernioplasty in the treatment of large ventral hernias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2023-3-15Keywords:
ventral hernia, incisional hernia, hernioplasty, meshAbstract
Laparoscopic hernioplasty is a promising treatment option for ventral hernias. The technique of intraperitoneal mesh placement (IPOM) is the most extensively studied and widely used for the closure of a defect during laparoscopic hernia repair. The large size of the defect and its diameter exceeding 10 cm are limiting factors in the selection of minimally invasive techniques for hernioplasty. The process of suturing the hernia prior to the placement of the mesh, as well as the technique used to fix it, show controversial results in terms of postoperative quality of life and the risk of recurrence.
Objective — to study the technical aspects of performing laparoscopic prosthetic hernioplasty using the IРOM technique for the surgical treatment of patients with large primary ventral hernias (PVH) and postoperative incisional ventral hernias (IVH).
Materials and methods. The study included a total of 84 patients who were undergoing treatment at the clinical base of the Department of General Surgery No. 2 of Bogomolets National Medical University. There were 51 (60.7%) women and 33 (39.3%) men. The average age was 58.73±10.9 years. All patients were operated on for large ventral hernias. Of these, 52 (61.9%) patients had surgery for PVH (umbilical hernia, line alba hernia), while 32 (38.1%) — for IVH. In 56 (66.7) patients, the width of the hernia defect was > 10 cm, of which 24 (28.6%) patients had PVH. In these patients, 4 weeks before surgery, 100 units of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) were injected intramuscularly into the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall in accordance with the methodology developed in the clinic. All patients underwent laparoscopic prosthetic hernioplasty with IPOM under general combined anesthesia. Control examinations of patients were carried out 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation.
Results. All patients underwent IPOM, while 38 (45.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic IPOM with suturing of the defect, 36 (42.9%) patients underwent IPOM with suturing the hernia defect before placing the mesh (IPOM+), and 10 (11.9%) patients underwent IPOM without suturing the defect. 32 (38.1%) patients were aged 65 years, including 10 patients who did not undergo suturing of the defect before the mesh placement. After the injection of BTA, the number of patients with a defect width of ≥10 cm decreased to 15 (17.8%). All of these patients had a defect smaller than 15 cm. The average duration of surgery for IPOM without hernia suturing was 60.00±11.30 min; for IPOM with laparoscopic suturing, it was 108.16±40.29 min; for IPOM+ with open suturing, it was152.08±40.64 min. The average length of stay in the hospital after surgery was higher in the group of patients who underwent hernioplasty using the IPOM+ technique compared to other techniques (p <0.001). In the early postoperative period, the complication rate was 13.1%; all cases were classified as minor (Grade I, II, IIIa) according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.
Conclusions. Laparoscopic hernioplasty using the IPOM is a safe and reliable method for large ventral hernia repair. Administering preoperative BTA injections enables the reduction of the defect and facilitates the execution of laparoscopic hernioplasty in patients with a primary hernia size of ≥10 cm.
References
Tarasiuk TV. The first experience of use botulinum toxin type a in the surgical treatment of ventral hernias. Hospital Surgery. Journal named by L.Ya. Kovalchuk. 2020;(2):102-5. http://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.2.10775.
Feleshtynskyi YaP. Pisliaoperatsiini hryzhi zhyvota. Kyiv: Biznes-Lohika; 2012. 200 p. Ukrainian
Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)). Part A [published correction appears in Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul 12;:]. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3069-139. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7.
Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3511-49. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06908-6.
Campanile FC, Podda M, Pecchini F, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias: the Italian national guidelines. Updates Surg. 2023;75(5):1305-36. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01534-3.
Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK. Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg. 2013;37(1):42-51. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1810-y.
Dey A. Should seroma be considered a complication?. Hernia. 2022;26(1):377-8. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02385-w.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Gonzalez AM, Romero RJ, Seetharamaiah R, Gallas M, Lamoureux J, Rabaza JR. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11(2):120-5. http://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1605.
Haisley KR, Vadlamudi C, Gupta A, Collins CE, Renshaw SM, Poulose BK. Greatest quality of life improvement in patients with large ventral hernias: an individual assessment of items in the HerQLes survey. J Surg Res. 2021;268:337-46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.075.
Jenkins ED, Yom V, Melman L, et al. Prospective evaluation of adhesion characteristics to intraperitoneal mesh and adhesiolysis-related complications during laparoscopic re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3002-7. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1076-0.
Jeong S, Anwoju TA, Olavarria OA, et al. Fascial defect closure during ventral hernia repair: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. HCA Healthc J Med. 2023;4(4):267-78. Published 2023 Aug 29. http://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1469.
Mercoli H, Tzedakis S, D’Urso A, et al. Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1469-77. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2.
Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair [published correction appears in Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):153]. Hernia. 2012;16(3):261-7. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8.
Mueller MD, Tschudi J, Herrmann U, Klaiber C. An evaluation of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(7):802-4. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190085.
Olmi S, Millo P, Piccoli M, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of incisional and ventral hernia. JSLS. 2021;25(2):e2021.00007. http://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00007.
Othman IH, Metwally YH, Bakr IS, Amer YA, Gaber MB, Elgohary SA. Comparative study between laparoscopic and open repair of paraumbilical hernia. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2012;42(1). http://doi.org/10.12816/0006305.
Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD007781. Published 2011 Mar 16. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.
Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, et al. Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected] [published correction appears in Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2485]. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2463-84. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4293-8.
Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K. Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature. Surg Today. 2016;46(7):764-73. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y.
Ventral Hernia Working Group, Breuing K, Butler CE, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148(3):544-58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008.
Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S. Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1296-302. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1.
Zou Z, Zhang D, Liu Y, Wang M. Postoperative compression in preventing early complications after groin hernia repair. Hernia. 2023;27(4):969-77. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02752-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.