Comparative evaluation of different types of gastric conduits used for single-stage reconstruction during oesophageal cancer esophagectomy. Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2023-3-73Keywords:
oesophageal cancer, esophagectomy, oesophageal reconstruction, gastric conduit, gastric tubeAbstract
In the treatment of local and local‑regional oesophageal cancer, esophagectomy takes centre stage. It is a complex procedure with a high rate of postoperative complications. There are different methods for oesophageal reconstruction, including colon interposition, supercharged jejunal interposition, and gastric pull‑up. Each has both advantages and disadvantages. However, a gastric graft is the preferred option due to the less traumatic nature of the operation. Currently, there are different methods for forming a gastric graft. Gastric conduits are classified based on their shape and can be categorised as whole‑stomach, sub‑total stomach, or gastric tube. Previous research on the functional characteristics of gastric conduits revealed that the most effective solution is a typical gastric tube. Due to its width (3—6 cm), the gastric tube limits its impact on lung movement within the pleural cavity, hence decreasing the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications (e.g., pneumonia). Pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks are the main contributing causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Other complications include technical and functional issues, as well as delayed problems such as anastomotic strictures and disease recurrence. However, the rate of complications remains between 20 and 80%, prompting oncologic surgeons to develop new methods for gastric conduit formation. Over the past 5 years, innovative methods using a special‑shaped gastric tube have been suggested. They appear to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications and enhance nutritional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the advantages of using special‑shaped gastric tubes in clinical practice as opposed to whole‑stomach and typical gastric tubes.
References
Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg. 1978 Nov;188(5):606-10. http://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197811000-00004. PMID: 718285; PMCID: PMC1396768.
Booka E, Takeuchi H, Morita Y, Hiramatsu Y, Kikuchi H. What is the best reconstruction procedure after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis comparing posterior mediastinal and retrosternal approaches. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 May 2;7(4):553-64. http://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12685. PMID: 37416735; PMCID: PMC10319624.
Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):536-41; discussion 541-2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.026. PMID: 15051003.
Collard JM, Tinton N, Malaise J, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Esophageal replacement: gastric tube or whole stomach? Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2):261-6; discussion 267. http://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00411-d. PMID: 7646084.
Fabbi M, Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment. Dis Esophagus. 2021 Jan 11;34(1):doaa039. http://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa039. PMID: 32476017; PMCID: PMC7801633.
Fengfeng Y, Yan Z, Long Q, et al. Application value of the fusiform tube stomach in the digestive tract reconstruction after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal carcinoma. Chin J Dig Surg. 2018;17(8):810-6. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/wpr-699203.
Flanagan JC, Batz R, Saboo SS, et al. Esophagectomy and gastric pull-through procedures: surgical techniques, imaging features, and potential complications. Radiographics. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):107-21. http://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150126. PMID: 26761533.
Haverkamp L, Seesing MF, Ruurda JP, Boone J, V Hillegersberg R. Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. http://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12480. PMID: 27001442.
Hirst J, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Thomas J, Barbour A. Defining cure for esophageal cancer: analysis of actual 5-year survivors following esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1766-74. http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1508-z. Epub 2011 Jan 7. PMID: 21213056.
Hung PC, Chen HY, Tu YK, Kao YS. A comparison of different types of esophageal reconstructions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):5025. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175025. PMID: 36078955; PMCID: PMC9457433.
Kalff MC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Baas PC, Bahadoer RR, Belt EJT, Brattinga B, Claassen L, Ćosović A, Crull D, Daams F, van Dalsen AD, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, Drost M, van Duijvendijk P, Eshuis WJ, van Esser S, Gaspersz MP, Görgec B, Groenendijk RPR, Hartgrink HH, van der Harst E, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, van Hillegersberg R, Kelder W, Kingma BF, Koemans WJ, Kouwenhoven EA, Lagarde SM, Lecot F, van der Linden PP, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Olthof PB, van der Peet DL, Pierie JEN, Pierik EGJMR, Plat VD, Polat F, Rosman C, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, Scheer R, Slootmans CAM, Sosef MN, Sosef OV, de Steur WO, Stockmann HBAC, Stoop FJ, Voeten DM, Vugts G, Vijgen GHEJ, Weeda VB, Wiezer MJ, van Oijen MGH, Gisbertz SS. Trends in Distal Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Care: The Dutch Nationwide Ivory Study. Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):619-28. http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005292. Epub 2021 Nov 11. PMID: 35129488.
Kikuchi H, Endo H, Yamamoto H, et al. Impact of reconstruction route on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy: analysis of esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Sep 6;6(1):46-53. http://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12501. PMID: 35106414; PMCID: PMC8786683.
Kolh P, Honore P, Degauque C, Gielen J, Gerard P, Jacquet N. Early stage results after oesophageal resection for malignancy — colon interposition vs. gastric pull-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Sep;18(3):293-300. http://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00524-8. PMID: 10973538.
Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4274-81. http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3189-x. Epub 2013 Aug 14. PMID: 23943033.
Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallböhmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Hölscher AH. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(4):310-4. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00431.x. PMID: 15569369.
Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Kurokawa Y, et al. Multimodal treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jul;59(7):461-6. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-011-0780-6. Epub 2011 Jul 14. PMID: 21751104.
Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Tokairin Y, Hoshino A, Okada T. Flexible gastric tube: a novel gastric tube formation method to prevent anastomotic leakage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):e445-e447. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.084. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PMID: 32088288.
Napier KJ, Scheerer M, Misra S. Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014 May 15;6(5):112-20. http://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.112. PMID: 24834141; PMCID: PMC4021327.
Pauthner M, Haist T, Mann M, Lorenz D. Surgical therapy of early carcinoma of the esophagus. Viszeralmedizin. 2015 Oct;31(5):326-30. http://doi.org/10.1159/000441049. Epub 2015 Oct 16. PMID: 26989387; PMCID: PMC4789960.
Poh M, Selber JC, Skoracki R, Walsh GL, Yu P. Technical challenges of total esophageal reconstruction using a supercharged jejunal flap. Ann Surg. 2011 Jun;253(6):1122-9. http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318217e875. PMID: 21587114.
Raz DJ, Tedesco P, Herbella FA, Nipomnick I, Way LW, Patti MG. Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(1):69-72. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00736.x. PMID: 18197942.
Kyrkylevsky SI, Krachmalev SN, Kondratsky YN, et al. Surgical treatment of patients with esophageal malignant tumor. Clinical Oncology 2013;2(10): 24-30. Ukrainian.
Sharma S. Management of complications of radical esophagectomy. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;4(2):105-11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-013-0215-1. PMID: 24426709; PMCID: PMC3693150.
Shu YS, Sun C, Shi WP, Shi HC, Lu SC, Wang K. Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage. Ir J Med Sci. 2013 Sep;182(3):477-80. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0917-y. Epub 2013 Feb 10. PMID: 23397501.
Then EO, Lopez M, Saleem S, Gayam V, Sunkara T, Culliford A, Gaduputi V. Esophageal cancer: an updated surveillance epidemiology and end results database analysis. World J Oncol. 2020 Apr;11(2):55-64. http://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1254. Epub 2020 Mar 29. PMID: 32284773; PMCID: PMC7141161.
Tsujimoto H, Ono S, Sugasawa H, Ichikura T, Yamamoto J, Hase K. Gastric tube reconstruction by laparoscopy-assisted surgery attenuates postoperative systemic inflammatory response after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2830-6. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0757-0. PMID: 20703457.
Van der Wilk BJ, Hagens ERC, Eyck BM, Gisbertz SS, van Hillegersberg R, Nafteux P, Schröder W, Nilsson M, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, van Berge Henegouwen MI; International Esodata Study Group Collaborators. Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group. Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 24;109(3):283-90. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab432. PMID: 35024794; PMCID: PMC10364762.
Xu EX. Professor Yin Li: «non-tube no fasting»-an innovative management of fast-track surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Jun;3(9):129. http://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.05.09. PMID: 26207257; PMCID: PMC4481361.
Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, Sun W. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7. PMID: 27927246; PMCID: PMC5143462.
Zhang C, Wu QC, Hou PY, et al. Impact of the method of reconstruction after oncologic oesophagectomy on quality of life-a prospective, randomised study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):109-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.04.032. Epub 2010 Jun 9. PMID: 20538475.
Zhang M, Li Q, Tie HT, Jiang YJ, Wu QC. Methods of reconstruction after esophagectomy on long-term health-related quality of life: a prospective, randomized study of 5-year follow-up. Med Oncol. 2015 Apr;32(4):122. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0568-0. Epub 2015 Mar 19. PMID: 25788030.
Zhang W, Yu D, Peng J, Xu J, Wei Y. Gastric-tube versus whole-stomach esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):e0173416. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173416. PMID: 28267808; PMCID: PMC5340360.
Zheng X, Yang YS, Hu WP, et al. Coniform gastric tube for end-to-end anastomosis during minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr;109(4):e297-e300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 30. PMID: 31794736.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
