Modern endovascular treatment strategies in the management of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage in patients with pancreatic cancer

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2024-1-8

Keywords:

postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, endovascular techniques, endovascular embolisation, stent graft

Abstract

Objective — to determine the occurrence and management of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage in pancreatic cancer patients, as well as to identify effective treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Materials and methods. From January 2010 to December 2022, 878 patients who underwent radical pancreatic resections for malignant tumours were retrospectively analysed.

Patients were divided into two groups. The main group consisted of 500 patients who were treated in the clinic from 2016 to 2022. In the main group, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage occurred in 31 (6.2%) patients. These patients were treated according to our diagnostic and treatment algorithm, using endovascular techniques as the first step of treatment. The comparison group consisted of 378 patients who were treated in our department from 2010 to 2015. In the comparison group, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage occurred in 20 (5.3%) patients. These patients were treated according to standard approaches. The definition of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage proposed by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery was used in our research.

Results. Out of 31 patients in the main group, 16 (51.6%) had endovascular embolisation. A total of 10 patients underwent endovascular occlusion, whereas 5 patients experienced cessation of bleeding with the use of a stent graft. Angiography did not detect the cause of bleeding in 3 (9.7%) individuals in the main group. They underwent laparotomy with subsequent haemostasis. 11 (35.5%) patients underwent open surgical interventions. In the main group, one (3.2%) patient died due to the emergence of infectious complications after laparotomy and subsequent haemostasis. 2 (10%) patients underwent endovascular haemostasis, while 15 (75%) patients underwent relaparotomy with haemostasis. In the comparison group, 6 (30%) patients died after open relaparotomies.

Conclusions. The initial course of action for managing postpancreatectomy haemorrhage involves the implementation of endovascular techniques, wherein stent grafts are used to address bleeding originating from the main blood vessel. The application of advanced treatment strategies that optimised the use of minimally invasive endovascular techniques resulted in a notable decrease in the mortality rate associated with postpancreatectomy bleeding from 30% to 3.2% (χ2=7.3, p=0.006). Ensuring 24/7 access to endovascular treatment, which can be provided exclusively in high‑volume centres, is imperative for improving the treatment outcomes of patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

 

Author Biographies

V. M. Kopchak, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, DSci (Med), Prof., Head of the Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery, Surgeon of the highest category, Surgical Oncologist

L. O. Pererva, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, DSci (Med), Senior Researcher of the Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery, Surgeon of the highest category, Surgical Oncologist

V. A. Kondratiuk, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, DSci (Med), Senior Researcher of the Department of Endovascular Surgery, Surgeon

I. V. Khomiak, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, DSci (Med), Prof., Leading Scientific Researcher of the Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery, Surgeon of the highest category

O. V. Duvalko, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery, Surgeon

I. A. Mazanovych, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, Head of the Department of Endovascular Surgery, Surgeon

V. V. Khanenko, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, Surgeon, Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery

V. I. Trachuk, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, Researcher, Head of the Department of Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics, Surgeon

P. A. Azadov, O. O. Shalimov National Institute of Surgery and Transplantology of NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv

MD, Surgeon, Department of Pancreatic and Bile Ducts Surgery

References

Ansari D, Tingstedt B, Lindell G, Keussen I, Ansari D, Andersson R. Hemorrhage after major pancreatic resection: incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome. Scand J Surg. 2017 Mar;106(1):47-53. http://doi.org/10.1177/1457496916631854. Epub 2016 Jul 8. PMID: 26929287.

Asai K, Zaydfudim V, Truty M, et al. Management of a delayed post-pancreatoduodenectomy haemorrhage using endovascular techniques. HPB (Oxford). 2015 Oct;17(10):902-8. http://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12464. Epub 2015 Jul 31. PMID: 26235930; PMCID: PMC4571758.

Biondetti P, Fumarola EM, Ierardi AM, Carrafiello G. Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management. Gland Surg. 2019 Apr;8(2):150-63. http://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.01.06. PMID: 31183325; PMCID: PMC6534758.

Chang YC, Liu KL, Huang YC, et al. Efficacy and hepatic complications of three endovascular treatment approaches for delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: evolution over 15 years. CVIR Endovasc. 2019 Oct 22;2(1):33. http://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-019-0077-x. PMID: 32026015; PMCID: PMC6966415.

Duarte Garcés AA, Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, et al. Reappraisal of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) classifications: do we need to redefine grades A and B? HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):702-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 16. PMID: 29459002.

Floortje van Oosten A, Smits FJ, van den Heuvel DAF, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ. Diagnosis and management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2019 Aug;21(8):953-61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Apr 6. PMID: 30962134.

Funamizu N, Omura K, Takada Y, Ozaki T, Mishima K, Igarashi K, Wakabayashi G. Geriatric nutritional risk index less than 92 is a predictor for late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;12(10):2779. http://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102779. PMID: 32998260; PMCID: PMC7600944.

Gaudon C, Soussan J, Louis G, Moutardier V, Gregoire E, Vidal V. Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: Predictive factors of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous endovascular treatment. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016 Nov;97(11):1071-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 31. PMID: 27592120.

Giuliani T, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Bassi C. Complications after pancreatic surgery. How to deal with them? In: Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons; 2021. P. 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119570097.ch59.

Izumo W, Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Uemura S, Shiihara M, Yamamoto M. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Dec;404(8):967-74. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01830-w. Epub 2019 Oct 24. PMID: 31650216; PMCID: PMC6935390.

Maccabe TA, Robertson HF, Skipworth J, Rees J, Roberts K, Pathak S. A systematic review of post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage management stratified according to ISGPS grading. HPB (Oxford). 2022 Jul;24(7):1110-1118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 31. PMID: 35101359.

Roulin D, Cerantola Y, Demartines N, Schäfer M. Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jun;15(6):1055-62. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1427-8. Epub 2011 Jan 26. PMID: 21267670.

Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, Büchler MW. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;16(1):11-26. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1. PMID: 30341417.

Thobie A, Robin F, Menahem B, et al. Influence of hemorrhagic complications of pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with cancer on short- and long-term mortality. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 13;12(8):2852. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082852. PMID: 37109189; PMCID: PMC10143756.

Tonolini M, Ierardi AM, Carrafiello G. Elucidating early CT after pancreatico-duodenectomy: a primer for radiologists. Insights Imaging. 2018 Aug;9(4):425-36. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0616-3. Epub 2018 Apr 13. PMID: 29654405; PMCID: PMC6108971.

Wang G, Li ZB. Clinical treatment strategy for post pancreatectomy hemorrhage. World Chinese Journal of Digestology. 2018 Oct;26(28):1628-34. http://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v26.i28.1628.

Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage — incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Mar;18(3):464-75. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2437-5. Epub 2014 Jan 22. PMID: 24448997.

Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001. PMID: 17629996.

Wolk S, Grützmann R, Rahbari NN, et al. Management of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) over two decades — A comparative study of 1 450 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Pancreatology. 2017 Nov-Dec;17(6):943-50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.10.006. PMID: 29111264.

Wu X, Chen G, Wu W, et al. Management of late hemorrhage after pancreatic surgery: treatment strategy and prognosis. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520929127. http://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520929127. PMID: 32500775; PMCID: PMC7278322.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

Issue

Section

Original Research