Management of ventral hernias: treatment results based on the developed algorithm

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30978/GS-2024-4-25

Keywords:

postoperative hernia, ventral hernia, hernia repair, botulinum toxin type A

Abstract

The surgical treatment of anterior abdominal wall hernias is one of the most common procedures in elective surgery. However, the rate of laparoscopic hernioplasty is lower when compared to open methods. Experience in treating large ventral hernias (і 10 cm) using minimally invasive techniques is limited due to the inability to compare the edges of the hernial defect without component separation.

Objective — to develop an algorithm for choosing a surgical treatment method for patients with ventral hernias and to evaluate the results of treatment.

Materials and methods. A prospective multicenter study was conducted, which included 534 patients with ventral hernias of various sizes. All patients were treated from September 2011 to November 2024. Preoperatively, patients with hernias ≥10 cm were injected with 100 Units of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) into the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall. The mean age of the patients was 56.49±14.59 years, with 307 (57.5%) women and 227 (42.5%) men. All patients underwent hernia surgery using laparoscopic and open hernioplasty methods according to the developed algorithm.

Results. The algorithm classified patients into three groups based on their hernia size: group 1 — patients with hernias <4 cm wide (n=269; 50.4%), group 2 — with a size of 4—10 cm (n=173; 32.4%), and group 3 — with a size of ≥10 cm (n=92; 17.2%). The mesh was placed intraperitoneally during laparoscopic hernia repair. In all three groups, laparoscopic hernioplasty demonstrated a significantly lower rate of complications and length of hospital stay compared to open procedures (p <0.01). Seromas were among the most common complications in all three groups in our study (n=19; 7.1% vs n=26; 15.0% vs n=14; 50%), and their frequency increased with hernia defect size. In group 3, among patients with large hernias, BTA administration allowed for the reduction of the aponeurosis defect to ≤10 cm in size in 89.4% of cases and the performance of laparoscopic surgery in patients who agreed to it. The recurrence rate after laparoscopic surgery was 0.8%, while after open surgery, it was 1.1%.

Conclusions. The use of the algorithm for selecting the hernioplasty method allows implementing a personalized approach to the surgical treatment of patients with ventral hernias. Laparoscopic hernioplasty with intraperitoneal mesh placement demonstrates significantly better results compared to open methods of hernia repair in terms of length of hospital stay and complication rate (p <0.01). The use of BTA for hernias ≥10 cm in the preoperative period makes it possible to perform hernioplasty using laparoscopic techniques and minimize surgical trauma in case the patient refuses laparoscopy.

 

Author Biographies

O. Y. Ioffe, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

MD, Prof., Head of the Department of General Surgery No2

T. V. Tarasiuk, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assoc. Prof. in the Department of General Surgery No2

M. S. Kryvopustov, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

PhD, Assist. in the Department of Surgery No2

O. P. Stetsenko, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assoc. Prof. in the Department of General Surgery No2

References

Aly S, de Geus SWL, Carter CO, Hess DT, Tseng JF, Pernar LIM. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis. Hernia. 2021;25(3):673-677. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02243-1.

Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A [published correction appears in Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3140-2. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06977-7]. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3069-3139. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7.

Bougard H, Coolen D, de Beer R, et al. HIG (SA) Guidelines for the Management of Ventral Hernias. South African Journal of Surgery. 2016;54(4):S1-S32.

Campanile FC, Podda M, Pecchini F, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias: the Italian national guidelines. Updates Surg. 2023;75(5):1305-1336. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01534-3.

Chowbey P, Wadhawan R, Subramanian D, et al. Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus. Hernia. 2024;28(5):1511-1523. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Fry BT, Howard RA, Thumma JR, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Sheetz KH. Surgical Approach and Long-Term Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(9):1019-1028. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1696.

Henriksen NA, Kaufmann R, Simons MP, et al. EHS and AHS guidelines for treatment of primary ventral hernias in rare locations or special circumstances. BJS Open. 2020;4(2):342-353. http://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50252.

Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, et al. Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg. 2020;107(3):171-190. http://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489.

Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting [published correction appears in Am J Infect Control. 2008 Nov;36(9):655]. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-332. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.

Ioffe OY, Tarasiuk TV, Kryvopustov MS, et al. Strength comparison of different methods of closing the anterior abdominal wall defect (experimental study). Wiad Lek. 2020;73(6):1217-1222.

Köckerling F. Recurrent Incisional Hernia Repair-An Overview. Front Surg. 2019;6:26. Published 2019 May 14. http://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00026.

Liang MK, Berger RL, Li LT, Davila JA, Hicks SC, Kao LS. Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(11):1043-8. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587.

Lindmark M, Löwenmark T, Strigård K, Gunnarsson U. Major complications and mortality after ventral hernia repair: an eleven-year Swedish nationwide cohort study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):426. Published 2022 Dec 13. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01873-9.

Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair [published correction appears in Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):153]. Hernia. 2012;16(3):261-7. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8.

Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407-414. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.

Parker SG, Mallett S, Quinn L, et al. Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3):zrab047. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab047]. BJS Open. 2021;5(2):zraa071. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa071.

Pereira C, Rai R. Open Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20490. Published 2021 Dec 17. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20490.

Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM. Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(3):378-386. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6.

Sagar A, Tapuria N. An Evaluation of the Evidence Guiding Adult Midline Ventral Hernia Repair. Surg J (N Y). 2022;8(3):e145-e156. Published 2022 Aug 2. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749428.

Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society [published correction appears in Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad349. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad349]. Br J Surg. 2023;110(12):1732-68. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad284.

Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M. Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD007781. Published 2011 Mar 16. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.

Schjøth-Iversen L, Sahakyan MA, Lai X, Refsum A. Laparoscopic vs open repair for primary midline ventral hernia: a prospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):300. Published 2023 Aug 8. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02958-6.

Yang S, Wang MG, Nie YS, Zhao XF, Liu J. Outcomes and complications of open, laparoscopic, and hybrid giant ventral hernia repair. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(1):51-61. http://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.51.

Zaman J, Teixeira L, Patel PB, Ridler G, Ata A, Singh TP. From transabdominal to totally extra-peritoneal robotic ventral hernia repair: observations and outcomes. Hernia. 2023;27(3):635-643. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02767-2.

Zhang Y, Zhou H, Chai Y, Cao C, Jin K, Hu Z. Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38(9):2233-2240. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Ioffe O, Tarasiuk T, Kryvopustov M, Stetsenko O. Management of ventral hernias: treatment results based on the developed algorithm. ЗХ [Internet]. 2024Dec.30 [cited 2025Feb.5];(4):25-3. Available from: http://generalsurgery.com.ua/article/view/322140

Issue

Section

Original Research